SECRET LOANS:
What happens now?
By: Joseph Hanlon
MOZAMBIQUE: News reports
& clippings 316
24 April 2016
Like a naughty schoolboy caught smoking in the bike shed who is then
summoned to the school principal's office, Prime Minister Carlos Agostinho do
Rosario flew to Washington to appear before IMF Managing Director Christine
Lagarde. Apparently he confessed to her that at least $1.35 bn in loans were
taken out in secret without telling parliament or donors - or, most
importantly, the IMF.
At least $2.2 bn - equivalent to all government spending for five months
- has been squandered in secret on boats of dubious necessity and, it is widely
assumed, on corrupt payments. So, what happens now?
There are two guiding principles which will shape whatever happens.
First, Frelimo is obsessed by
maintaining unity at all costs. Ever since Eduardo Mondlane was assassinated in
1969, Frelimo has realised that it
can only gain and keep power by not splitting up. That means no one is expelled
from the party, no matter how corrupt or incompetent they are; anyone who might
be a threat is given a sinecure. Disputes are settled within the party and the
aim is for win-win agreements.
The Ematum bond was said to
benefit allies of the former President Armando Guebuza. One of the secret loans
just revealed benefitted the military when the current president, Filipe Nyusi,
was defence minister.
The second guiding principle is that the big multinational lenders and
donors - the IMF, World Bank and EU - as well as the bigger bilateral donors,
need to provide money to Mozambique. Aid officials are mainly judged and
promoted based on how much money they dispense. Despite war and scandal,
Mozambique is seen as a country they can work with and which largely follows
donor policies; Maputo is a pleasant place to work.
The result is a tacit agreement. During the scandals of 1990s when more
than $400 mn was stolen from banks, and again with Ematum, the donors and lenders have tried to curb the most
egregious excesses. But mostly they only made angry noises. In particular, they
have never required Frelimo to
publicly identify the culprits - those senior in the party who stole huge
amounts and even ordered murders. That, in turn has allowed Frelimo to stay united.
Despite being offended, Christine Lagarde will not cut off Mozambique,
because that would look bad for the IMF. Similarly the World Bank and EU will
argue they have large development programmes which benefit most Mozambicans, so
they should not stop those.
A few European donors with conservative governments might take their aid
elsewhere, but most will not (Note out of
the editor: Like UK government who just announced, last week, to the Mozambican
High Commissioner in London, Filipe Chidumo, that have decided to cancel the
support loans to Mozambican budget).
The willingness to never name the crooks is because the network of
patronage has been skilfully constructed; anyone who is identified will name
others. That, in turn, could split the party. Both Frelimo and the donors and lenders fear that a split party could
lose the next election, and most donor and lender officials would not want a
government run by the present opposition. This, in turn, gives substantial
negotiating power to Nyusi, Guebuza, do Rosario and Finance Minister Adriano Maleiane.
Secret loans taken in 2013 total at least $1.35 bn and it appears more
will be revealed. This is on top of the $850 mn Ematum loan.
Reuters on Friday listed four loans. ProIndicus,
a state firm owned by the Ministries of Interior and Defence and the State
Security and Intelligence Service (SISE) was lent $504 mn by Credit Suisse and
$118 mn by Russia's VTB. The third loan was $535 mn to Mozambique Asset Management, a state company creating the gas
logistics terminal in Pemba. Fourth, the Interior Ministry borrowed $130-$200
mn. Those four loans total between $1287 mn and $1357 mn. It is believed this
is not all, and more loans are to be revealed.
According to a February 2013 Credit Suisse document obtained by Reuters, the money was earmarked for acquiring high-speed naval interceptors, radar stations, off-shore patrol vessels and aircraft.
According to a February 2013 Credit Suisse document obtained by Reuters, the money was earmarked for acquiring high-speed naval interceptors, radar stations, off-shore patrol vessels and aircraft.
A history of hiding debt
The set of five loans taken in secret in 2013 totals $2137 to $2207 mn.
But this is just part of Mozambique's total foreign debt. And it appears that
Mozambique has been telling different stories to everyone, from the IMF to
bondholders to its own parliament and courts, over its debt.
Zitamar reported Tuesday (19 Apr) that in 2012 (before the secret loans)
the public was told the debt was $4.8 bn but Ematum bond investors were told it was $5.2 bn - already a $400 mn
gap, suggesting an earlier secret loan.
In 2013 the gap was already $1 bn - the public was told public debt was
$5.8 bn while investors were told $6.8 bn. Ematum
bondholders were told last month that in 2014 (after the five secret loans were
taken) Mozambique's debt was $8.2 bn while the public statement was $7 bn. This
difference looks like the four secret loans.
The Tribunal Administrativo
statement last November on government finances said there were only three
government guaranteed loans - Ematum,
the airports authority, and the road fund. But even that was not correct.
Zitamar points out the Finance Ministry Spokesman Rogério Nkomo admitted on STV,
on 15 April, that the ProIndicus
loans were government guaranteed.
Government guaranteed loans must be approved by parliament, but it
appears that the IMF and donors, parliament, and the Tribunal Administrativo were not informed about some loans. “It is
probably one of the largest cases of the provision of inaccurate data by a
government the IMF has seen in an African country in recent times. They
deliberately kept from us at least a billion dollars, possibly higher, of
hidden loans,” an anonymous IMF official told the Financial Times (18
Apr)...
The Ematum rescheduling
prospectus issued earlier this year said total debt in 2015 was $11 bn, of
which $9.7 was foreign debt, according to Zitamar. The jump from $8.2 bn to $11
bn is not explained.
The IMF issued a terse note on Saturday 23 April saying: "Following
a meeting held earlier this week between Carlos Agostinho do Rosario, Prime
Minister of Mozambique and Ms. Christine Lagarde, IMF Managing Director, a
technical team led by the Vice-Minister of Finance, Ms. Isaltina Lucas, worked
intensively with the IMF Mozambique staff team.
The authorities acknowledged that an amount in excess of $1 billion of
external debt guaranteed by the government had not previously been disclosed to
the Fund. Staff welcomed the authorities’ extensive disclosure of information
which constitutes an important first step toward full restoration of trust and
confidence." The IMF has, however, suspended further lending to
Mozambique, including the second tranche of an already agreed loan.
There has been no similar "extensive disclosure" in
Mozambique, however.
Response to the secret debt revelations
The Bank of Mozambique said it made $200 mn in repayments in foreign
loans last month, mostly for Ematum, only by dipping into resident's dollar
deposits. (Zitamar 21 Apr) The central bank also raised the base lending rate
from 10.75% to 12.75%.
Meanwhile the Metical has
plummeted as people try to buy dollars. Rates of up to Mt 60 = $1 were reported
on the parallel market. On Friday the Bank of Mozambique quoted Mt 53 = $1 and
Mt 3.7 = Rand 1. This is compared to 50 and 3.2 a month ago, on 24 March, and
47 and 3.0 on 29 February.
Mozambique’s former Information Minister, Teodato Hunguana, and a member
of the Frelimo Central Committee, told O País (22 Apr) that at its
meeting the previous week the Central Committee "demanded that
explanations be given, not only to Frelimo members, but to the nation. The
nation has to know what is really going on." At the Central Committee
meeting, “it was clearly said that we have to see what" part of the debt
is for military purposes and what part for "private interests, and it is
those interests that must be called upon to answer”.
He warned there was a danger of Mozambique being recolonized by the
international creditors, as happened with Greece and Portugal.
The Budget Monitoring Forum (Fórum
de Monitoria do Orçamento) has demanded "an exhaustive audit of the
Mozambican public debt… in order to know the real amounts involved, the
creditors and the payment period for each of the debts”.
The Forum is a coalition of some of the main civil society
organisations, including the Community Development Foundation (FDC), the Centre
for Public Integrity (CIP), and the Community Radio Forum (FORCOM). The report
(in Portuguese) has a good list of all known non-concessional debt. http://bit.ly/Moz-commercial-debt
CIP has published a report (Portuguese only) pointing to "the fact that the government has not yet seen the necessity of informing the Mozambican people or giving an explanation to parliament," three weeks after the secret loans were revealed. "Desastre da dívida pública em Moçambique: O governo vem violando o princípio de transparência orçamental". http://www.cip.org.mz/article.asp?sub=moc&docno=459
Credit Suisse has come under heavy criticism for making secret loans for military equipment and not telling other borrowers or the IMF. The Financial Times quoted a "foreign diplomat" to say "Credit Suisse has some quite big questions that so far it has not really wanted to answer."
CIP has published a report (Portuguese only) pointing to "the fact that the government has not yet seen the necessity of informing the Mozambican people or giving an explanation to parliament," three weeks after the secret loans were revealed. "Desastre da dívida pública em Moçambique: O governo vem violando o princípio de transparência orçamental". http://www.cip.org.mz/article.asp?sub=moc&docno=459
Credit Suisse has come under heavy criticism for making secret loans for military equipment and not telling other borrowers or the IMF. The Financial Times quoted a "foreign diplomat" to say "Credit Suisse has some quite big questions that so far it has not really wanted to answer."
Credit Suisse has some record of misjudged secrecy; earlier this month
it said it faced potential operational losses of $3.6 billion, in part because
$1 bn in illiquid trading positions were kept secret from top bank officials.
Comentários
Enviar um comentário